制度-契约-信用三重约束下城市轨道交通PPP隐性债务风险生成机制与治理路径——基于扎根理论的动态分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京工程学院 管理工程学院;2.东南大学;3.南京工程学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

</sup>教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“城市轨道交通PPP项目引发政府隐性债务风险的形成机理、动态预警与调控研究”(21YJCZH226)


Mechanism and governance path of implicit debt risk generation in urban rail transit PPP under the triple constraints of system contract credit: a dynamic analysis based on grounded theory
Author:
Affiliation:

1.NANJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY;2.SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY

Fund Project:

General Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research by the Ministry of Education

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本研究基于扎根理论对城市轨道交通PPP项目的隐性债务风险进行动态解构,揭示“制度约束→契约异化→信用嵌套→财政压力”的非线性传导路径,突破传统静态分析范式。通过多源数据融合(政策文本、深度访谈、项目合同)与三级编码分析,发现隐性债务风险是制度性信任缺失、风险收益失衡与信用杠杆异化的复合产物,其核心机制体现为财政支付刚性化、风险分配非对称性及融资结构嵌套传导的协同效应。研究构建“制度-契约-信用”三重约束下的动态治理框架,提出制度层面需完善动态财政承受能力论证与中小企业扶持政策协同,契约设计应推行“超额收益共享-缺口风险共担”弹性条款,融资传导需隔离政府信用并创新资产证券化工具。该框架为破解“稳投资”与“防风险”目标冲突提供理论范式,助力PPP模式从债务驱动向价值共创转型,对“十四五”时期基础设施高质量发展具有决策参考价值。

    Abstract:

    This study dynamically deconstructs the implicit debt risk of urban rail transit PPP projects based on grounded theory, revealing the nonlinear transmission path of "institutional constraints → contract alienation → credit nesting → fiscal pressure", breaking through the traditional static analysis paradigm. Through multi-source data fusion (policy texts, in-depth interviews, project contracts) and three-level coding analysis, it was found that implicit debt risk is a composite product of institutional trust loss, risk return imbalance, and credit leverage alienation. Its core mechanism is reflected in the synergistic effects of rigid fiscal payments, asymmetric risk allocation, and nested transmission of financing structures. Research and construct a dynamic governance framework under the triple constraints of "system contract credit", proposing that the institutional level needs to improve the demonstration of dynamic fiscal capacity and coordinate with support policies for small and medium-sized enterprises. Contract design should implement flexible clauses of "excess return sharing gap risk sharing", and financing transmission should isolate government credit and innovate asset securitization tools. This framework provides a theoretical paradigm for resolving the conflict between the goals of "stable investment" and "risk prevention", and helps transform the PPP model from debt driven to value co creation. It has decision-making reference value for the high-quality development of infrastructure during the 14th Five Year Plan period.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-06
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-06
  • 录用日期:2025-05-29
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭