算法推荐服务提供者备案义务的困境检视与制度完善
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

西南政法大学人工智能法学院,重庆, 401120

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D912.1

基金项目:


A Review of the Dilemma Faced by Algorithmic Recommendation Service Regarding Filing Obligations and the Renewal of Regulatory Frameworks
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Artificial Intelligence and Law, Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing 401120 , China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2021年,国家网信办等部门出台的《互联网信息服务算法推荐管理规定》要求具备舆论或社会动员能力的算法推荐服务提供者依法进行备案。此制度旨在创新监管模式,实现“敏捷治理”,平衡算法安全与创新。然而,算法备案的法律属性在行政备案视角下存在诸多争议,阻碍了制度的有效落地。同时,内容边界的不明确和信息公开机制的缺失也引发了质疑。应对这些挑战需明确算法备案的行政事实属性,规范并完善内容范围界定和信息公开机制,从而最大限度地发挥算法备案制度在提升算法监管效能、控制算法风险、保障公民权益及维护公共利益方面的作用,推动科技向善,确保技术发展与社会福祉的和谐共生。

    Abstract:

    In 2021, the National Internet Information Office and other relevant departments issued the “Regulations on the Management of Algorithm Recommendation in Internet Information,” which mandate that algorithm recommendation service providers possessing public opinion or social mobilization capabilities to file for record-keeping in accordance with legal requirements. This regulatory framework aims to innovate governance models, achieve “agile governance,” and balance algorithm security with innovation. However, there are numerous controversies regarding the legal nature of algorithm filing from an administrative perspective, which impede its effective implementation. Furthermore, ambiguities surrounding content boundaries and a lack of information disclosure mechanisms have raised further concerns. To tackle these challenges, it is imperative to elucidate the administrative factual attributes associated with algorithm filing and to standardize and improve definitions of content scope as well as information disclosure mechanisms. By undertaking this endeavor, the efficacy of the algorithm filing system in bolstering regulatory efficiency can be optimized, mitigating algorithmic risks, safeguarding citizens rights, and championing public interests. This will promote technology for good and ensure a harmonious coexistence between technological development and social welfare.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘田龙.算法推荐服务提供者备案义务的困境检视与制度完善[J].南京工程学院学报(社会科学版),2025,25(1):53-61.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-22
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-05-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭