我国教育领域共同富裕法治保障研究———以宪法上的平等受教育权为中心
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

洪骥,博士,讲师,研究方向为宪法学与行政法学、国家治理。E-mail:kouki2012waseda@126.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D920.0;D61

基金项目:

工业和信息化部2023 年指导性软课题“行政复议制度在信息通信领域发挥化解行政争议主渠道作用的新挑战与应对研究”(GXZK2023 10)


Research on the Legal Guarantee of Common Prosperity in the EducationField of China Centered on the Equal Right to Education in the Constitution
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    共同富裕不仅仅是经济、社会领域的议题,在教育领域也应受到关注。教育领域共同富裕的实现有利于公平正义的伸张,更是习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想枝繁叶茂的题中之意。然而我国教育资源分配的不均衡现象由来已久,宪法诉讼制度及宪法解释等的欠缺,使得法治对教育领域共同富裕的保障尚付阙如。我国教育领域共同富裕实现之难题,需要在习近平法治思想的指导下,重构宪法上的“平等受教育权”内涵,在规范构造上应以《宪法》第33 条第3 款规定的“人权保障”为依归,以《宪法》第33 条第2 款规定的“平等权”和第46 条规定的“受教育权”为两翼,从而形成一个稳定的“品字形”架构。而该解释论层面的教育领域共同富裕的宪法表达,即“平等受教育权”规范,在实际运用层面则应深度结合相关立法和司法过程,为教育领域共同富裕的实现提供坚实的制度性保障。

    Abstract:

    Common prosperity is not only an issue in the economic and social fields but also deserves attention in the field of education.The realization of common prosperity in education is conducive to the promotion of fairness and justice and it embodies the essenceof Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. However the uneven distribution of educationalresources in China has a long history coupled with the lack of institutional resource allocation such as constitutional litigation and interpretationmaking the guarantee of the rule of law for common prosperity in the field of education still lacking. Faced with the challengesof achieving common prosperity in the field of education in China it is necessary under the guidance of Xi Jinping's ideologyon the rule of law to redefine the connotation of “equal right to education” in the Constitution. In terms of normative construction itshould be based on the “ uman rights guarantee” stipulated in Article 33 3 of the Constitution with the “ qual rights” specified inArticle 33 2 and the “ ight to education” in Article 46 forming the two wings thus forming a stable “ in-shaped” framework. At theinterpretive level the constitutional expression of common prosperity in the field of education namely the “ qual right to education” norm should be deeply combined with relevant legislative and judicial processes in practical application providing a solid institutionalguarantee for the realization of common prosperity in the field of education.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

洪骥,周叶欣. 我国教育领域共同富裕法治保障研究———以宪法上的平等受教育权为中心[J]. 南京工程学院学报(社会科学版),2024,24(1):31 38.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-14
  • 最后修改日期:2023-12-28
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-05-29
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭