对赌协议中股权回购之履行
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

杨晓航,硕士研究生,研究方向为民商法学。E-mail:yangxiaohang365@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

D922.291.91

基金项目:


The Performance of Equity Repurchase in the Valuation Adjustment Mechanism
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    《全国法院民商事审判工作会议纪要》指出,投资方和目标公司之间的对赌协议倘若不存在法定无效事由,则合法有效,但其针对协议中股权回购的履行所提供的途径,仍存在减资程序前置不妥、恐难通过、目标公司对赌回购履行能力审查困难等障碍。法律规定层面应该解绑减资程序与股权回购,披露、公示对赌协议的存在及其数额;司法实践层面应丰富目标公司股权回购义务履行能力审查标准和方式;在当事人意思自治层面,投资方可以完善对赌协议股权回购条款设计,以平衡各方利益。

    Abstract:

    According to the “9th Minutes of Meeting”, valuation adjustment mechanisms (VAMs) between investors and target companies are legal and valid unless there are statutory reasons for invalidity. However, there are still barriers to implementing equity repurchase under VAMs, such as the inappropriateness of the capital reduction procedure being a prerequisite, the difficulty in passing the capital reduction procedure, and the challenges in assessing the target company's ability to perform equity repurchase. To overcome these, it's suggested that at the legal provision level, the capital reduction procedure should be decoupled from equity repurchase, and the existence and amounts of VAMs should be disclosed and publicized. At the judicial practice level, the criteria and methods for assessing the target company's ability to fulfill equity repurchase obligations should be enriched. At the level of party autonomy, the equity repurchase clauses in VAMs should be improved to better balance the interests of all parties.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

杨晓航,骆小春.对赌协议中股权回购之履行[J].南京工程学院学报社会科学版,2023,23(4):31-35.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-06
  • 最后修改日期:2023-12-06
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭